ΤΕΧΝΙΚΗ ΤΗΣ ΜΑΣΤΟΓΡΑΦΙΑΣ: Από την βασική επιστήμη έως την καθημερινή κλινική πρακτική

1. Μαρκόπουλος, “Εγχειρίδιο: καλοήθεις και κακοήθεις παθήσεις του μαστού”, Ιατρικές Εκδόσεις
Π.Χ. Πασχαλίδης, Αθήνα 2007.
2. Hogg P., Kelly J. & Mercer C., “Digital Mammography. A Holistic Approach”, Springer International
Publishing, Switzerland 2015.
3. Κελλαρτζής Δ. και συν., “Ανατομία, φυσιολογική διάπλαση και διαταραχές της ανάπτυξης των
μαστών”. Ελληνική Μαιευτική και Γυναικολογία, 2009; 21(2): 115-121.
4. Πινακίδης Μ. & Μπουτής, Λ., “Καρκίνος μαστού”, Εκδόσεις University Studio Press, Θεσσαλονίκη,
1993.
5. Bistoni G. and Farhadi J., “Anatomy and Physiology of the Breast. In: Plastic and Reconstructive
Surgery. Approaches and Techniques”, 1st ed. s.l.:Wiley Blackwell 2015, pp. 479-485.
5. Kahle W. et al, “Εγχειρίδιο ανατομικής του ανθρώπου με έγχρωμο άτλαντα”, Ιατρικές εκδόσεις
Λίτσας, Germany 1984.
6. Sandberg, M., “Contralateral Breast Cancer -Risk and Prognosis”, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
2012.
7. Biology Forums, n.d. Biology Forums Study force. [Online].
8. Miller L., “Mammography Positioning Guidebook”, 2nd Edition ed. s.l.:Mammography Educators,
2015.
9. Παπανικολάου Ν., “Μαστολογία”. Θεσσαλονίκη, 1989.
10. Μαζούκα Λ., Μανδρέκας Α. και Μπαρμπούνης Β., “ Σύγχρονη Μαστολογία”, Ιατρικές Εκδόσεις
Π.Χ. Πασχαλίδης, Αθήνα 2007.
11. Κατσώχης Κ. και συν., “Χειρουργικές Παθήσεις Μαστού”, Eκδόσεις University Studio Press,
Θεσσαλονίκη 2000.
12. Tahir M. T. & Shamsudeen, S., 2022. Mastalgia. [Online]
13. Dr. Chen Lee, Montreal Plastic Surgeon, 2023. Breast Lift Surgery. [Online]
14. Sweeny R.J. et al., “A review of mammographic positioning image quality criteria for the
craniocaudal projection”, Brit J Rad 2017; 91(1082).
15. Tatar A., 2019. SlidePlayer. [Online]
16. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2023. Atlas of breast cancer early detection -
Interpreting the abnormal mammogram. [Online]
16. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit,
Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
17. Kharazami E. et al., “Effect of multiplicity, laterality, and age at onset of breast cancer on familial
risk of breast cancer: a nationwide prospective cohort study”, Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;
185-192.
18. Mukama T. et al., “Familial risk of breast cancer by dynamic, accumulative, and static definitions
of family history”, Cancer 2020; 126(12):2837-2848.
19. Braithwaite D. et al., “Family History and Breast Cancer Risk Among Older Women in the Breast
Cancer Surveillance Consortium Cohort”, JAMA Intern Medicine 2018; 178(4): 494-501.
20. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2019. Familial breast cancer: classification,
care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast
cancer - Clinical Guideline. [Online]
21. National Cancer Institute, “BRCA1 and BRCA2: cancer risks and management (PDQ®) – health
professional version”, 2023 [Online]
22. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), “NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology:
Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic”, Version 2.2021,
PubMed 19(1): 77-102.
23. Beebe-Dimmer J. et al., “Familial clustering of breast and prostate cancer and risk of postmenopausal
breast cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative Study, Cancer 2015; 121(8):1265-1272.
24. Leongamornlert D. et al., “Germline BRCA1 mutations increase prostate cancer risk”, British
Journal of Cancer 2012; 106: 1697-1701.
25. Shuai L. et al., “Cancer Risks Associated With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants”, Journal
of Clinical Oncology 2022; 40(14): 1529-1541.
26. Derenburger D. & Hadley R., “Patient History: Details, Documentation and Delivery”, 2019.
[Online]
27. Vee, Β., Gullien, R., Handberg, E., Inger Johanne Hoftvedt, I., Hoftvedt, I., Iden, K., & Ertzaas, A.,
2011. Retningslinjer For Radiograffaglil Arbeid.
28. Mercer C. E. et al., “Practical mammography”, in P. Hogg, J. Kelly, & C. Mercer, “Digital
Mammography: A Holistic Approach” 2015: 175-188, Springer International Publishing.
29. Miller L. C., and Lehmann T. L., “Image Quality & Positioning Problem-Solving for Breast Imagers:
Meeting Equip Standrads”, Mammographyeducators.com, 2020.
30. Bassett L. W., et al., “Digital Mammography: Clinical Image Evaluation”, Radiologic Clinics of North
America 2010; 48(5): 903-915.
31. Huppe A. I., et al., “Mammography Positioning Standards in the Digital Era: Is the Status Quo
Acceptable?”, American Journal of Roentgenology 2017; (209): 1419-1425.
32. Meystre N. R., n.d. Mammographic Artefacts, s.l.: s.n.
33. Ayyala R. S. et al., “Digital Mammographic Artifacts on Full-Field Systems: What Are They and How
Do I Fix Them?”, RadioGraphics 2008; 28(7).
34. Geiser W. et al., “Challenges in Mammography: Part 1, Artifacts in Digital Mammography”,
American Journal of Roentgenology 2011; 197(6).
35. Andolina V. F., and Lille S. L., “Mammographic Positioning. In Mammographic Imaging A Practical
Guide”, 2010: 136, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
36. Kopans D., “Mammographic Positioning. In Breast Imaging”, 2007, (3rd Edition ed., pp. 283-286,
310-311). Philadelphia: PA: Lippincott Williams & Wikins.
37. Kopans D. B., “Image Sequencing - Problems and Solutions in Breast Evaluation”, Breast Imaging
2007: 1141 – 1144, Boston: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
38. Oncohema KeyFastest Oncology & Hematology Insight Engine, 2016, “Mammography Techniques,
Positioning, and Optimizing Image Quality”.
39. Rodriguez Suarez I., et al., “Diagnostic mammography: how, why and when”, 2018; doi:10.1594/
ecr2018/C-1972
40. Lewis P. J., “Mammographic Views and lesion localization”, 2021.
41. Chotai N., and Kulkarni S., “Additional Views”, Breast Imaging Essentials 2020; 15-20, Singapore:
Springer.
42. Spuur K., “A review of mammographic lesion localisation and work up imaging in Australia in the
digital era”, Radiography 2019; 25(4): 385-391.
43. epos/ECR (Επιμ.). (2020). Additional Views. Improvement Strategies .
44. “Atlas of Breast Cancer Early Detection”.
45. Zuurbier R. A. and Lewis P. J., “Breast Imaging guide”, Retrieved from Dartmouth Geisel School
of Medicine, 2021.
46. Alimoglu E. et al, “An Effective Way to Solve Equivocal Mammography Findings: The Rolled Views”,
Breast Care 2010;(5): 241-245.
47. Laszlo T., et al, “Mammography Positioning Technique”, Breast Cancer 2005 - The art and Science
of Early Detection with Mammography (p. 466).
48. Aheconline. (n.d.). Positioning .
49. Zuley M. L. and Braner S. L., “Positioning in Mammography”, in L. W. Bassett, M. Mahoney, S. Apple,
& C. J. D’Orsi, Breast Imaging 2011: 110-120, Elsevier Inc. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-
4160-5199-2.00006-0
50. Andolina V. F. and Lille S. L., “Mammographic Positioning”, in Mammographic Imaging A Practical
Guide 2010: 136. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
51. Peart O., “Positioning challenges in mammography”, Radiologic Technology 2014; 85(4): 420-421.
52. Yang N. and Muradali D., “The Augmented Breast: A Pictorial Review of the Abnormal and
Unusual”, American Journal of Roentgenology 2011; 196(4).
53. Borrelli C. and Vegnuti Z., NHS Breast Screening Programme Screening women with breast
implants, 2017.
54. Sá dos Reis et al., “Study of breast implants mammography examinations for identification of
suitable image quality criteria”, Springer, 2020.
55. Park J., et al., “Appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants”
Scientific Reports, 2023.
56. Mammography Educators. Positioning for Implant Displacement, 2023.
57. Thongchai P., “The surgically altered breast: imaging technique and findings”, Gland Surgery
2014; 3(1).
58. Oncohema KeyFastest Oncology & Hematology Insight Engine, Mammography Techniques,
Positioning, and Optimizing Image Quality, 2016.
59. Suliman N. et al., “Effect of Compressed Breast Thickness on Average Glandular Dose (AGD)
During Screening Mammography using Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM)”, Journal of
Academia 2020; 8(1): 34-44.
60. Dustler M., “Pressure Distribution in Mammography Mechanical Imaging and Implications for
Breast Compression”, 2016.
61. Perry N., et al., European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and
diagnosis. European Commission, 2006.
62. Hendrick E. et al., “Mammography, Quality Control Manual”, 1999.
63. Poulos A. et al., “Breast compression in mammography: How much is enough?”, Australasian
Radiology 2003; 47(2): 121-126.
64. Feder K. and Grunert J., “Is Individualizing Breast Compression during Mammography useful?
- Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and
surface area of the compressed breast”, Rofo 2017; 189(1): 39-48.
65. Niklason L. T. et al., “Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging”, Radiology 1997; 205: 399–406.
66. Schepoulos I., “A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process”, Med
Phys 2013, 40:(1):014301.
67. Onur TO., “An application of filtered back projection method for computed tomography images”,
Int Rev App Sci and Eng 2021;12(2): 194-200.
68. Lu Liu, “Model-based Iterative Reconstruction: A Promising Algorithm for Today’s Computed
Tomography Imaging”, J Med Imag and Rad Sci 2014; 45(2): 131-136.
69. Zuckerman SP. et al., “Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a
Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program”, Radiology 2016; 281(3):
730-736.
70. Dhamija E. et al, “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: an Overview”, Indian J Surg Oncol 2021;
12(2):315-329.
70. Tirada N. Et al., “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Physics, Artifacts and Quality Control Consideration”,
RSNA 2019; 39:413-426.
71. Gilbert F.J., et al. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of tomosynthesis with digital mammography in
the UK NHS breast screening programme—a multicen-tre retrospective reading study comparing
the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with
digital mammography alone. Health Technol Assess 2015;19(4):i–xxv, 1–136.
72. Skaane P., et al. “Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital
mammographic images”, Radiology 2014;271(3):655–663
73. Svahn T.M. et al., “Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to
those in two-view full-field digital mammography”, Breast 2015;24(2):93–99.
74. Arlond M. et al., “Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and
2040”, Breast 2022; 66: 15-23.
75. Torre L.A. et al., “Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends – an update”, Cancer
Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016; 25(1): 16-27.
76. Dibden A, et al., “Worldwide review and meta-analysis of cohort studies measuring the
effect of mammography screening programmes on incidence-based breast cancer
mortality”, Cancers 2020; 12: 976.
77. Nazari S. and Mukherjee P., “An overview of mammographic density and its association with
breast cancer”, Breast Cancer 2018; 25(3): 259-267.
78. Nazari S. and Mukherjee P., “An overview of mammographic density and its association with
breast cancer”, Breast Cancer 2018; 25(3): 259-267.
79. Sogani J. et al., “Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Past, Present and Future”, Clin Imaging
2021; 69: 269-279
80. Watt AC et al., “Differentiation between benign and malignant disease of the breast using digital
substraction angiography of the breast”, Cancer 1985; 56: 1287-1292.
81. Dromain C. et al., “Dual-Energy contrast -enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical results
of a multireader, multicase study”, Breast Cancer Res. 2012; 14: R94.
82. Yang ML et al., “Contrast enhanced mammography: focus on frequently encountered benign and
malignant diagnoses”, Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:10.
83. Lidewij MFH et al., “Contrast-enhanced mammography: what the radiologist needs to know”,
BJR|Open 2021; 3:1.
84. Lalji UC et al., “Evaluation of low-contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing
them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria”, Eur Radiol 2015;
25(10): 2813-2820
85. Coffey K and Jochelson MS, “Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening”,
European Journal of radiology 2022; 156 vol. 156.
86. Jochelson M.S. et al., “Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility
and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known
breast carcinoma”. Radiology 2013; 266(3):743–751.
87. Jochelson M.S. et al. Comparison of screening CEDM and MRI for women at increased risk for
breast cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Radiol 2017;97:37–43
88. Sung J.S. et al. Performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography for
screening women at increased risk of breast cancer. Radiology 2019;293:81–8
89. Sorin V. et al. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in women with intermediate breast
cancer risk and dense breasts 2018:1–8.
90. D’Orsi C.J., Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA. “Acr BI-RADS® Atlas, breast imaging reporting
and data system. Reston”, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.
91. Geunwon K. et al., “Contrast-enhanced Mammography: A Guide to Setting Up a New Clinical
Program”, Journal of Breast Imaging 2021; vol 3, issue 3: 369-376.
92. James J.R. et al., “Breast radiation dose with CESM compared with 2D FFDM and 3D tomosynthesis
mammography.”, Am. J. Roentgenol. 2017; 208: 362-372.
93. Jochelson M. and Lobbes M., “Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art”, Radiology
2021; 299(1): 36-48.
94. Beroukas E. et al., “Increased Chromosomal Radiosensitivity in Women Carrying BRCA1/BRCA2
Mutations Assessed with the G2 Assay” Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 15;76(4): 1199-205.
95. https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/artificial-intelligence-tutorial/ai-vs-machine-learning-vsdeep-learning
96. Taylor CR., “Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Imaging: Current Status and Future
Directions”, Diagnostics 2023; 13(12), 2041.
97. Chavoin, J., Morgan, M., Vaucher, R., Moreno , B., Chaput, B., & Grolleau, J. (2019). Breasts and
Pectus Excavatum. In Pectus Excavatum and Poland Syndrome Surgery. (pp. 71-87). Springer.
98. Ioannou, M., Merkouris, S., Papakonstantinou, I., Micha, D., Papapaschali, C., & Athanasiou, A.
(2019). Breast hookwire localization under mammographic guidance at 6 o’clock position.
EPOS -ECR. doi:10.26044/ecr2019/C-1296
99. Miller, L. C. (2023). Challenging Patients & Situations Part 1: Positioning Tips. Retrieved from
https://mammographyeducation.com/challenging-patients-part-1-positioning-tips/
100. Suleimenova, D., Eghtedari, M., Ojeda-Fournier, H., & Jolla, L. (2019). Evaluation of symptomatic
male breast. doi:10.26044/ecr2019/C-0084
101. Temples, H., Rogers, R., Willoughby, D., & Holaday, B. (2017). Marfan Syndrome (MFS): Visual
Diagnosis and Early Identification. n Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 31(5), pp. 609-617.
doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2017.05.002
102. Tucker, A. K., & Ng, Y. (2001). Mammography positioning technique. In Textbook of Mammography
(2nd Edition ed., pp. 35-59). Edinburgh, UK: Harcourt Publishers.
103. Wikihealth. (2022). Σκαφοειδής θώρακας. Ανάκτηση από Wikihealth: https://wikihealth.gr/
symptoms/skafoidis_thorakas/
104. Γραμματοπούλου, Ε. (2014). Αναπνευστική Φυσικοθεραπεία. Αθήνα: Ανοικτά Ακαδημαϊκά Μα-
θήματα στο ΤΕΙ Αθήνας. Ανάκτηση από Wikimedia Commons: https://ocp.teiath.gr/modules/
document/file.php/FTHER_UNDE104/4_%CE%91%CE%BE%CE%B9%CE%BF%CE%BB%CF%8C
%CE%B3%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7_%CE%B1%CE%BD%CE%B1%CF%80%CE%BD%CE%B5%C
F%85%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%BF%CF%8D_%CE%B1%CF%83%CE%B8%CE%
B5%CE%BD%CE%AE_%CE%B2%28%CE%A